| Pages: [1] |
1. EFT v2.13.4 - Incursion 1.4.1 - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I am having problems being unaBLE To see the missing skills when i mouse over the red bar to the right of the character select box, the popup is there but no text, is there a fix coming for that?
- by Dureena Nafee1 - at 2012.10.06 10:32:00
|
2. Captains Quarters... ideas, suggestions and enhancements - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Arcathra wrote: Here are some of my own thoughts so far: Enhancements I would like to be able to customise the screens. What announcements and information they show. For example I as a veteran don't need any hint to the career agents or Incu...
- by Dureena Nafee1 - at 2012.08.09 16:57:00
|
3. Interesting difference on the Black Ops Cloak - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
It is a disguise so that your prey/predator sees you as something else, so a carrier disguised as a drake or hurricane a small pvp squad thinks you are easy pickings, so head in for the kill - POW - you are decloaked and open up decimating the at...
- by Dureena Nafee1 - at 2012.08.09 15:46:00
|
4. Long Warp - An alternative to Star Gates and Jumping - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
This idea is intriguing, so how about adding a new galaxy to explore, a single jump gate to a concord controlled system, then all other jumps from there are via this method, and you can then introduce Gate Building Ships. Like a Pos but you can...
- by Dureena Nafee1 - at 2012.08.09 14:44:00
|
5. Interesting difference on the Black Ops Cloak - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I had a thought on a sort of Tech 3 Cloak, Rather than cloak the ship completely, It also does not deactivate during jumps. You select a type of ship with a script and then when activated makes your ship look to scans and probes as a different ...
- by Dureena Nafee1 - at 2012.08.09 14:32:00
|
6. Roles and access to them - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
I was reading about a suggestion to change the Locking Blueprints to role based, the problem with this is if you then put it to a specific role to then deny the CEO access or one of the other directors all they need to do is then give themselves t...
- by Dureena Nafee1 - at 2012.04.29 09:26:00
|
7. Static Data - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I have been playing with the static data, dump I can see how to work out the blueprint requirements for standard blueprints example: punisher Blueprint id=944 punusher id=597 invtypematerials for 597 = ingredients needed Trit, pyerite, mex, iso...
- by Dureena Nafee1 - at 2011.10.13 15:24:00
|
8. EVE Online: Incursion to be deployed Tuesday April 5, 2011 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Arron Wade to be fair, I do like some of these Server-side ship fittings, the mass repackaging, that bookmark thing (don't know what they called it), being able to strip a ship without getting in it and the default squad co...
- by Dureena Nafee1 - at 2011.04.06 12:22:00
|
9. EVE Online: Incursion to be deployed Tuesday April 5, 2011 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Debbie Does Dallas Originally by: Azhpol Originally by: Ploppy McPlop So we agree, it's an issue that unfairly benefits many players and unfairly penalises others on a large scale, so why have CCP not done an...
- by Dureena Nafee1 - at 2011.04.06 12:12:00
|
10. Here's a thought - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
How about, CCP provide for anyone who is Neg standing to a faction they can purchase "Faction Pardon Certificates" These would be similar to the Starbase charters, and would allow a person with negative standing/negative sec status access to hig...
- by Dureena Nafee1 - at 2011.02.08 12:13:00
|
11. Corpmate: WTF I just got podded!? - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
what is so scary about rancer, We go in there all the time and camp Neg 10 in their station :) Dureena - Training to Lose 1 skill at a time.
- by Dureena Nafee1 - at 2010.08.10 15:43:00
|
12. To people that want to KEEP T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
I just wish it was easier to get to invention, specially if you have an expensive BPC and try to invent, I mean i have a wish to make Miner II and I have copied Miner I, can i invent? - NO I dont have a high enough standing to access any invention...
- by Dureena Nafee1 - at 2010.07.31 14:31:00
|
13. To people that want to KEEP T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
I would love to get my hands on T2 BPOs but how about, if you could take a T2 Item and use reverse Engineering to make a BPO... Maybe add that you need some item sold in NPC market items - like blueprint paper or somewhat, then i can buy a load o...
- by Dureena Nafee1 - at 2010.07.30 09:41:00
|
14. Tranquility downtime, Friday July 23 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hey why not chill on Sisi as its not down when Tranquility is.... or are you too scared to come kill my pos in Lamadent in Sisi..... Dureena - Training to Lose 1 skill at a time.
- by Dureena Nafee1 - at 2010.07.23 13:41:00
|
15. EvE economy - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Prototype ZX I know the idea of making all belts grav sites sounds bad. It isn't hard to accomplish though. Just have to make it easy to scan out. What I'm trying to force people to do is to make it to where macroing is mor...
- by Dureena Nafee1 - at 2010.06.18 16:54:00
|
16. Mining is collapsing? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
I have been reading this thread now for a while, WE control the market, without minerals nothing can be made Without minerals we have no T1 modules or ships. BUT, Greed is always the driving force, everyone wants to make their plex and so sells t...
- by Dureena Nafee1 - at 2010.06.15 19:31:00
|
17. Boosting lowsec by getting rid of it - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
how about a mix, Sec status of the system +/- your sec status, so those Pirates going into highsec could be shot at and a low chance of concord coming say 0.6 system and the offending player is sec status 0.2 that makes it approx a 0.8 system s...
- by Dureena Nafee1 - at 2010.05.17 11:17:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |